Fracture Within Sudan’s Tagaddum Coalition Over Civilian Governance Issues

Tagaddum, Sudan’s main civilian coalition, has split into factions due to disagreements over forming a parallel government, reflecting internal rifts amid ongoing conflict with the RSF. Supporters of a parallel government, including several former council members, emphasize a need for separate strategies to end the war and establish democratic rule. A government roadmap for post-conflict recovery also stresses disarmament and lifting sieges as prerequisites for negotiations.

In a significant development, Sudan’s primary civilian coalition, Tagaddum, has formally separated into factions over differing visions for the formation of a parallel government. This division reflects escalating tensions within the civilian bloc amidst the ongoing conflict between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia.

The split comes in light of Deputy Chairperson al-Hadi Idris’s efforts to create a civilian government that would contest the legitimacy of the administration appointed by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. Following discussions led by former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, Tagaddum’s leadership reached a consensus that the contrasting opinions necessitated a formal division.

According to Tagaddum’s statement, each faction shall function under its own political and organizational structure, adopting new identities with separate strategies aimed at ultimately bringing an end to the conflict, establishing democratic governance, and countering the former regime’s influence. Each group will independently announce its future plans.

Though Tagaddum did not specify the factions opposing the parallel government, it indicated that these groups constitute a majority within the coalition. Supporters of the parallel government include prominent figures such as al-Hadi Idris, al-Tahir Hajar, and Mohamed Hassan al-Taayshi, alongside Suleiman Sandal of a Justice and Equality Movement splinter faction.

Tagaddum comprises numerous political parties, armed movements, and independent leaders, making it one of Sudan’s largest civilian political coalitions. The internal divisions have become apparent following the coalition’s recent creation of a committee tasked with addressing the growing dispute regarding the proposed parallel government in RSF-controlled territories.

In conjunction with these developments, the Sudanese government has unveiled a roadmap for the post-conflict transition, which includes appointing a government of technocrats, selecting a civilian prime minister, and initiating a national dialogue amidst claims of military progress against the RSF. Notably, the Sudanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has outlined stipulations requiring armed groups to disarm and the RSF to lift its siege on El Fasher prior to any ceasefire or negotiation.

In conclusion, the fragmentation of Sudan’s Tagaddum coalition highlights significant ideological divides over governance amidst ongoing conflict. As factions pursue distinct strategies for resolving the crisis, the future of civilian rule in Sudan remains uncertain. The government’s newly announced roadmap also emphasizes the complications of achieving peace and stability until security conditions improve. Overall, this situation illustrates the intricate dynamics within Sudan’s political landscape and the challenges ahead for achieving a cohesive and effective governance structure.

Original Source: www.dailynewsegypt.com