The Free Market Foundation criticized the Democratic Alliance for failing to oppose the Expropriation Act unconditionally, claiming ideological betrayal. Martin van Staden suggests that the DA’s recent actions undermine its historical liberal values. In contrast, the DA defends its position, stating it is actively challenging the Act through legal means.

The Free Market Foundation (FMF) criticized the Democratic Alliance (DA) for its approach towards the new Expropriation Act, asserting that the party should oppose it without reservations. The FMF argued that the formation of the Government of National Unity (GNU) has led the DA to compromise its core liberal principles, effectively betraying its supporters.

Martin van Staden, FMF’s Head of Policy, indicated that the DA has shifted its focus from the act’s significant constitutional and economic flaws to merely addressing minor issues. He labelled this approach as ineffective, contending that it fails to demonstrate true opposition to the Expropriation Act while maintaining the DA’s position within the GNU.

“Liberalism’s value proposition is simple: individuals and communities — society — must chart their course. The state must secure society against coercion directed at people or their property,” stated Van Staden, emphasizing the need for the state’s limitations on power. He traced the DA’s ideological lineage back to historically liberal parties and argued that its current stance represents a significant co-option of its values.

Van Staden acknowledged that the DA is not a Marxist-Leninist party like the ANC, yet highlighted its troubling alignment with government policies that resemble those contributing to the crises seen in Zimbabwe and Venezuela. He noted that the DA’s failure to confront these issues undermines its liberal foundation.

The FMF reiterated that the DA has been consistently informed regarding the constitutional failings of the Expropriation Act, calling it a fundamental failure of the party to uphold liberal values. They believe that the DA was expected to be a part of the solution, yet its actions suggest otherwise.

In response, the DA dismissed the FMF’s claims of co-option and betrayal, labeling their accusations as unfounded. Karabo Khakhau, the party’s national spokesperson, reinforced the DA’s opposition to the Expropriation Act, citing recent court actions taken against it. She suggested that their legal strategies prioritize contesting the unconstitutionality of the Act’s passage.

Khakhau expressed that their efforts reflect a commitment to protect property rights, particularly against potential abuses permitted by the Act. The DA remains focused on challenging the constitutionality of the legislation through the appropriate legal channels unless the FMF’s criticisms are substantiated by evidence.

In summary, the Free Market Foundation has reproached the Democratic Alliance for succumbing to ideological influence as evidenced by its stance on the Expropriation Act. Despite this criticism, the DA has maintained that its legal efforts reflect a steadfast opposition to the Act, emphasizing the need to protect property rights. The ongoing contention between the two parties highlights crucial debates over property rights and governance within South Africa.

Original Source: www.newzimbabwe.com

Related posts:

Trump’s Proposed Tariffs: Implications for Trade Relations with Canada, Mexico, and China Trump Pauses Tariffs on Mexico and Canada Amid Trade Concerns and Inflation Risks International Outcry Over U.S. Deportation Policies and Treatment of Migrants Trump Reverses Oil Concessions to Venezuela Amid Unmet Conditions