Loading Now

India Considers Agricultural Tariff Rationalization Amid U.S. Scrutiny

India is reviewing agricultural tariffs, currently at 37.66%, to potentially better align with U.S. rates of 2.59%. This initiative aims to enhance trade while protecting local farmers, particularly affecting key exports such as rice, seafood, and guar gum. Economists advise that lower tariffs could alleviate risks from U.S. retaliatory tariffs, ensuring continued growth in trade relations between the two nations.

India is contemplating a rationalization of tariffs within its agricultural sector, where the current weighted average tariff stands at 37.66%, significantly higher than the United States’ 2.59%. This notable disparity, amounting to 32%, is expected to attract attention from American officials as India seeks to modify its import tax structure. The review, conducted by the state-owned Niti Aayog, indicates potential adjustments that would minimize impacts on local farmers while enhancing trade relations with the United States.

The review underscores that lowering agricultural tariffs could facilitate overall trade growth and provide Indian exports with enhanced access to the United States and North American markets. Key exports from India include rice, spices, dairy, and poultry products, with seafood, rice, and guar gum identified as prominent items that might be affected by tariff adjustments.

While India has already implemented some reductions in basic customs duties, U.S. officials have noted that Indian tariffs on agricultural goods are considerably elevated compared to their own. Economists warn that India’s substantial tariff rates and trade surplus with the U.S. render it vulnerable should reciprocal tariffs be imposed.

The U.S. is a significant market for Indian seafood, with the marine export value estimated at $2.58 billion for the 2023-24 period. Should the U.S. impose an additional 32.4% tariff, exports, particularly shrimp, would be adversely affected. Similarly, rice and guar gum exports, which are crucial for India’s economy, could face penalties hindering income for farmers.

Historical experiences suggest that India has previously navigated tariff challenges, notably during Trump’s presidency when additional tariffs on steel and aluminum pressured Indian exports. In retaliation, India established import duties on select American goods, leading to successful trade negotiations that restored prior tariff conditions. Current analyses suggest that if the U.S. were to enforce a generalized tariff, it might adversely impact India’s GDP and overall exports in the agricultural sector.

In conclusion, India is actively considering the rationalization of its agricultural tariffs to address significant disparities with the United States. This strategy aims not only to mitigate potential economic difficulties from U.S. tariffs but to enhance India’s export competitiveness in agricultural products. Historical precedents indicate that negotiated resolutions can effectively resolve tariff disputes, fostering more robust trade relations.

Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com

Post Comment