Vanuatu’s Proposed Amendment Limits Election Candidacy to Indigenous Citizens
A proposed constitutional amendment in Vanuatu would restrict election candidacy to indigenous Ni-Vanuatu citizens, leading to opposition claims of racism. The initiative aims to improve citizenship governance and cultural representation while focusing on third-generation citizens. Criticism highlights potential contradictions with existing constitutional provisions regarding citizenship rights.
The proposed constitutional amendment in Vanuatu aims to restrict election candidacy solely to indigenous Ni-Vanuatu citizens. This initiative is part of the government’s 100-day reform plan, which has sparked accusations of racism from opposition lawmakers.
The electoral reform is intended to enhance governance of the citizenship program, foster public confidence in citizenship procedures, and preserve national identity while ensuring cultural representation within the government.
Focus will be placed on naturalised citizens, as the amendment stipulates that only those who are third-generation citizens will be eligible to compete in elections.
Opposition leader Alatoi Ishmael Kalsakau criticized the amendment, asserting it legitimizes racial discrimination by the current government. He referenced the original intent of Vanuatu’s constitution, emphasizing that citizenship should be granted without prejudice.
According to Article 17 of the constitution, any citizen of Vanuatu aged 25 years or older is entitled to stand for election to parliament, highlighting the controversy surrounding the proposed changes.
In summary, the proposed constitutional amendment in Vanuatu restricts election eligibility to indigenous citizens, inciting claims of racism from the opposition. This proposal aims to enhance governance and preserve cultural identity but raises significant concerns regarding discrimination against naturalized citizens. The opposition warns that this amendment contradicts the foundational principles of equality outlined in Vanuatu’s constitution.
Original Source: constitutionnet.org
Post Comment