Negotiations between Afghanistan and Pakistan to resolve the Torkham border dispute have failed following the Afghan delegation’s withdrawal, citing Pakistan’s uncooperative stance. The dispute began with Afghan construction in Pakistani territory, worsening trade relations and border movement. While initial meetings led to a ceasefire, further discussions collapsed over delegation issues. Both parties recognize the need for dialogue to address the ongoing challenges.

Recent discussions aimed at resolving the ongoing Torkham border dispute between Afghanistan and Pakistan have succumbed to failure following the Afghan delegation’s decision to withdraw, citing Pakistan’s lack of seriousness in negotiations. The dispute commenced nearly three weeks ago when Afghan forces initiated construction activities in Pakistani territory adjacent to the Torkham border, reportedly aggravating tensions between the two countries.

Pakistan’s objections regarding the unauthorized construction led to heightened hostilities and the suspension of trade and cross-border movement. Consequently, this border closure has severely disrupted businesses and hindered travel for individuals on both sides. To address this situation, jirgas consisting of tribal leaders, businessmen, and officials were created four days prior to facilitate dialogue between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

During initial meetings, a ceasefire was established alongside an agreement to pursue further discussions concerning construction and the resumption of border operations. Although this ceasefire has been maintained, the Afghan delegation, represented by Younus Mohmand, Chairman of the Afghan Chamber of Commerce, opted to return to Torkham for subsequent talks after consulting with Taliban authorities.

Unfortunately, the negotiations faltered as the Afghan delegation alleged that Pakistan had expanded its representation without appropriate prior consultation. Following a two-hour wait, the Afghan jirga decided to depart, asserting that Pakistan’s jirga undermined authentic discussions. Upon return to Kabul, the Afghan delegation criticized the negotiations as ineffective and disorganized.

Sayed Jawad Hussain Kazmi, leader of the Pakistani jirga and adviser to the Federation of Chambers of Commerce, acknowledged the Afghan concerns regarding the delegation’s expansion, admitting that the communication of this change was inadequate. He clarified that Pakistan initially presented a list of 17 members; however, the Afghan side was not informed of more than 50 additional names that were included later.

Kazmi emphasized the critical nature of the Torkham border dispute, asserting its direct impact on economic stability, trade, and diplomatic relations between both nations. He reiterated the importance of dialogue in resolving the issue and committed to making efforts to re-engage the Afghan delegation in further discussions. Despite continuous attempts by Pakistani officials to maintain communication, the Afghan delegation had already returned to Kabul by the time contact was restored. The ongoing closure of the Torkham border continues to inflict financial burdens on traders and create difficulties for travelers on both sides.

The collapse of discussions between Afghanistan and Pakistan regarding the Torkham border dispute highlights the complexities of cross-border relations and underscored the necessity for effective communication and negotiation. The recent withdrawal of the Afghan delegation has intensified concerns surrounding economic stability and diplomatic connectivity between the two countries. Continued efforts will be essential in pursuing a resolution to restore normalcy and cooperation at the border.

Original Source: thenewsmill.com

Related posts:

Renewed Clashes Erupt Between Afghan and Pakistani Forces in Torkham Sector Taliban Requests Pakistan and Iran for Organized Refugee Returns Pakistan and Taliban Resume Diplomatic Talks to Strengthen Relations Arrest of Kabul Airport Bombing Planner Signals Pursuit of Justice