Politics
BEIJING DAILY, BO, CENSORSHIP, COMMUNIST PARTY, DONALD TRUMP, FOREIGN POLICY, GLOBAL TIMES, HAN, HU, HU XIJIN, HUN SEN, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, NORTH AMERICA, PRESS FREEDOM, RADIO FREE ASIA, RFA, SCMP, SOUTH CHINA SEA, TRUMP, UNITED STATES, US, US AGENCY FOR GLOBAL MEDIA, US-CHINA RELATIONS, VOA, VOICE OF AMERICA, WASHINGTON, XINJIANG
Clara Montgomery
Global Times Supports Funding Cuts to US Media Outlets Critical of China
The Global Times commended Trump’s cuts to the US Agency for Global Media, criticizing Voice of America for biased reporting against China. Various commentators echoed this sentiment, framing the reductions as a fight against misinformation.
The Global Times, a state-run publication in China, has expressed approval of the funding reductions to the US Agency for Global Media under the Trump administration. This agency manages several broadcasters, including Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA), which have faced Beijing’s criticism for their reporting on sensitive topics such as human rights abuses in China.
In its editorial, the Global Times criticized VOA, stating that its reporting on China has been profoundly problematic. The publication accused VOA of disseminating disinformation, particularly regarding the situation in Xinjiang, the South China Sea disputes, and the narrative surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The editorial claimed that the broadcaster has been complicit in promoting various negative portrayals of China.
In addition to the Global Times, other nationalist figures, including a columnist from Beijing Daily and Hu Xijin, the former editor-in-chief of Global Times, have also condemned the practices of VOA and RFA. Additional support for Trump’s funding cuts was expressed by former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, who characterized the action as a significant step towards combating global misinformation and chaos.
In summary, the Global Times and various nationalist commentators have welcomed funding cuts to US government-funded media outlets, perceiving them as a corrective measure against what they consider biased reporting. Criticisms of Voice of America and Radio Free Asia emphasize alleged inaccuracies regarding China’s human rights record and other sensitive issues. Such sentiments reflect a broader narrative surrounding global information dynamics.
Original Source: www.scmp.com
Post Comment