Ukraine has condemned Russia’s presidency of the UN Security Council as offensive, amidst discontent from the West. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov will oversee meetings on key international issues, yet concerns are raised over possible abuses of power. The US and Baltic states express alarm regarding Russia’s influence within the council, emphasizing the ongoing conflict’s implications for international governance.

On Saturday, Ukraine denounced Russia’s presidency of the UN Security Council for April as “a slap in the face,” amidst widespread condemnation from Western nations. This appointment highlights the diminished relations between Russia and the West since Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba characterized Russia’s leadership as harmful to the international community, urging current Security Council members to prevent any potential misuse of its presidential authority.

Russia last presided over the Security Council in February 2022, coinciding with its invasion of Ukraine, which triggered Kyiv’s demands for Russia’s expulsion from the council. Although Russia’s influence on decisions will be limited, it will control the agenda during its presidency. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov intends to lead discussions on “effective multilateralism” and a session on the Middle East later this month.

A UN Security Council diplomat acknowledged the possibility of a response should Russia abuse its presidency, but emphasized the need to focus on the ongoing war in Ukraine. The United States reiterated its criticism of Russia’s permanent membership in the Security Council, asserting that a country violating the UN Charter should not hold such influence.

Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania’s representatives expressed their alarm regarding Russia’s ascendance, particularly noting the timing coinciding with the anniversary of the Bucha massacre. Lithuanian officials mocked the appointment, highlighting Russia’s ongoing military aggression despite its new role. US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield anticipated that Russia might pursue opportunities to advance disinformation, yet she maintained expectations for professional conduct during its presidency.

In conclusion, Ukraine’s vehement opposition to Russia’s leadership of the UN Security Council underscores the significant tensions resulting from the ongoing conflict and international discontent with Moscow. Critical views from the US and Baltic states reflect concerns over the implications of this appointment for global governance and the credibility of the Security Council. Amidst these challenges, the focus remains on the urgent need to address the war in Ukraine and safeguard international standing.

Original Source: www.seychellesnewsagency.com

Related posts:

U.S. to Evaluate Ukraine’s Peace Concessions During Upcoming Saudi Talks Ukrainian Officials Set for U.S. Meetings in Saudi Arabia to Discuss Peace US Administration Affirms Ukraine Preparedness for Ceasefire Talks with Russia Zelensky’s Diplomatic Engagements as Hopes for Ukraine Peace Talks Resurface