Chinese state media has praised Donald Trump’s cuts to funding for the Voice of America and Radio Free Asia, affecting many employees. Critics label the decision a setback for democracy, while the White House defends it as avoiding taxpayer-funded propaganda. The cuts impact the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which supports these news outlets known for reporting in restricted areas. Journalists express concerns about diminished press freedom and increased empowerment of authoritarian regimes.

Chinese state media has responded positively to former President Donald Trump’s decision to cut public funding for news outlets including the Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA). This move has impacted a substantial number of employees, with approximately 1,300 staff members at VOA placed on paid leave following the executive order issued on Friday.

Critics regard this decision as detrimental to democracy; however, the Global Times, a state newspaper in Beijing, criticized the VOA for its historical reporting on China, labeling it as a “lie factory” that has now been “discarded by its own government like a dirty rag.” The White House defended the cuts, asserting they would relieve taxpayers from funding what they describe as radical propaganda.

The cuts specifically target the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which, funded by Congress, supports both VOA and RFA, among other outlets. These organizations have been recognized internationally for their journalism in regions with restricted press freedoms, including China, Cambodia, Russia, and North Korea. Despite the Chinese government’s prohibition of accessing these broadcasts, citizens can still utilize shortwave radio or VPNs to listen.

RFA has notably reported on human rights violations in Cambodia, where former Prime Minister Hun Sen endorsed the funding cuts as a measure against “fake news.” Additionally, RFA was among the first to highlight the existence of “re-education camps” in Xinjiang, China, where many Uyghur Muslims are reportedly detained, allegations that the Chinese government vehemently refutes.

In the United States, the National Press Club has expressed its concern, claiming that the order undermines the commitment to a free press long upheld by the nation. Originally established to counteract Nazi propaganda during World War II, VOA currently reaches around 360 million listeners weekly across nearly 50 languages. Its staff has faced significant challenges in light of these developments.

Michael Abramowitz, the director of VOA, articulated that the executive order significantly undermines the outlet while adversaries such as Iran, China, and Russia invest heavily in crafting disinformation narratives against the United States. Valdya Baraputri, a VOA journalist impacted by these changes, expressed feelings of betrayal regarding the perceived notion of press freedom in the country.

In response to the cuts, the Czech Republic has sought intervention from the European Union to continue support for Radio Free Europe, which broadcasts in 27 languages and addresses an audience exceeding 47 million weekly. RFA’s chief executive, Bay Fang, indicated plans to dispute the order, stating that slashing funding would empower dictators and oppressive regimes, permitting them unchecked influence over information dissemination.

Despite the approval of these funding cuts by Chinese state media, the sentiments of the Chinese populace remain obscure due to strict internet censorship. Nevertheless, external listeners, including dissidents and former journalists, reflect disappointment and alarm over the potential curtailment of independent journalism. Chinese dissident Du Wen emphasized the crucial role of VOA and RFA in fostering hope amid oppression, warning against the silencing of free voices within the global discourse.

In summary, the decision to reduce funding for organizations such as the Voice of America and Radio Free Asia has garnered mixed reactions. While Chinese state media welcomes this development as a means of furthering its narrative, critics assert that it undermines democracy and press freedom. The implications for employees, global journalism, and the communication landscape in authoritarian regimes are profound and concerning. Dialogue regarding these changes is essential to ensure transparency and accountability in media reporting.

Original Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Related posts:

Chinese State Media Celebrates Cuts to Voice of America Funding China Criticizes U.S. Media Funding Cuts as ‘Notorious’ Global Times Supports Funding Cuts to US Media Outlets Critical of China China Critiques U.S. Media Outlets Amid Funding Cuts by Trump Administration