The Diverging Paths of Happiness: A Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh and Finland
This article explores the differences in happiness levels between Bangladesh and Finland, attributing these disparities to cultural norms surrounding social comparison. While Bangladeshis often experience diminished happiness due to their tendency to compare themselves with peers, Finns prioritize modesty and self-contentment, resulting in higher happiness levels. Institutional factors also play an important role in supporting happiness in Finland, illustrating the complex interplay between culture and life satisfaction.
Happiness is a common goal, but the pathways to achieving it differ significantly among societies. The contrasting cases of Bangladesh and Finland illustrate how cultural norms, especially around social comparison, influence happiness levels. While Bangladesh demonstrates how pervasive social comparison can diminish happiness, Finland exemplifies a culture where such comparisons are less frequent, contributing positively to overall life satisfaction.
In Bangladesh, social comparison serves as a significant barrier to happiness. Children are raised with the belief that their success is measured in relation to their peers. For instance, a Bangladeshi child may receive little recognition for their academic achievements if they fall short compared to their classmates. This ingrained tendency to compare fosters a lifelong struggle with happiness as adults.
The inclination to compare oneself with others is not limited to Bangladesh; it is a common human behavior. For example, research involving Harvard students revealed a preference for earning less if it meant outperforming their peers financially, highlighting the broader trend of social comparison. This phenomenon is echoed by Richard Layard of the London School of Economics, who states that happiness does not necessarily rise with income increases if societal norms shift correspondingly.
Layard explains that societal perceptions of relative income significantly impact individual happiness, often overshadowing the importance of absolute income. In Bangladesh, individuals frequently judge their satisfaction by comparing their earnings with those of colleagues and friends, reflecting a broader societal mindset developed from childhood that places emphasis on relative success rather than absolute achievement.
Conversely, Finland presents a different dynamic regarding social comparison. For eight consecutive years, it has topped the World Happiness Report rankings, showcasing a cultural environment where modesty prevails. Finns often hide their wealth, prioritizing anonymity in their financial status. Dr. Frank Martela notes that Finnish youth typically express ordinary aspirations, recognizing that joy is found in life’s simple pleasures rather than in competition for status.
Moreover, institutional factors play a crucial role in Finnish happiness. Research indicates that countries with well-functioning democratic systems and effective governance tend to report higher levels of happiness. In Finland, comprehensive social benefits such as free healthcare, education, and unemployment support contribute significantly to citizen well-being, thereby mitigating sources of unhappiness.
Thus, social comparison can undermine happiness by fostering unattainable expectations. Individuals who consistently compare their achievements to others may cultivate feelings of jealousy and resentment, diminishing their overall happiness. While changing deeply ingrained social practices may be challenging, individuals in comparison-centric cultures like Bangladesh can enhance their happiness by adjusting their reference groups toward a more positive outlook, focusing on self-improvement rather than peer comparison.
In conclusion, the stark differences between Bangladeshi and Finnish cultures illustrate how social comparison affects happiness. Bangladesh’s competitive mentality often leads to dissatisfaction, while Finland’s emphasis on modesty and social support fosters contentment. Encouragement toward personal progress over societal comparison may offer a path to improved happiness for individuals entrenched in comparativist societies.
In summary, this analysis reveals that social comparison plays a critical role in shaping happiness levels in Bangladesh and Finland. Bangladeshis often gauge their satisfaction relative to their peers, which can lead to diminished feelings of happiness. In contrast, Finnish culture promotes modesty and less emphasis on social comparison, contributing to greater overall happiness. Understanding these dynamics can guide individuals in comparison-focused societies toward prioritizing personal achievements instead of societal benchmarks, thereby enhancing their happiness.
Original Source: thefinancialexpress.com.bd
Post Comment