Senator Kirsten Gillibrand criticized Elon Musk’s meeting at the Pentagon regarding China military plans, claiming he has “no business” there. Reports of sensitive discussions were denied by the Pentagon. Critics, including former officials, raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest due to Musk’s financial ties in China. Musk responded by discrediting the false information spread by the media.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand from New York expressed concerns over Elon Musk’s involvement with the Pentagon, asserting that he has “no business” being privy to military affairs. Reports from The New York Times indicated that Musk would receive sensitive military information concerning contingency plans regarding a potential conflict with China, which both the Pentagon and the White House later denied, stating that the briefing would not include discussions about China.

Gillibrand criticized Musk in a post on social media shortly before his arrival at the Pentagon, highlighting her role on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Critics have raised alarm over the possible conflicts of interest, considering Musk’s investments in China through Tesla and SpaceX’s collaboration with the federal government on military space initiatives.

Former President Donald Trump promptly countered the Times’ report, deeming it “completely untrue” and stating that discussions about China would not transpire during Musk’s visit. Trump underscored that the assertion of a briefing on a potential war with China was ludicrous.

Xochitl Hinojosa, a former Obama administration official, also voiced her concerns regarding Musk’s Pentagon visit, suggesting that career officials are alarmed about the implications of information access by Musk. Hinojosa claimed that the leak to the media was driven by the unease of career Pentagon officials about potential unethical conclusions.

The New York Times detailed that Musk would attend a briefing that potentially involved strategy presentations against China. It asserted that the meeting would utilize a secure room known as the Tank, typically reserved for high-level military discussions. The briefing was claimed to include detailed plans regarding military strategies aimed at Chinese targets and their communication with former President Trump.

Amid the high confidentiality surrounding Pentagon war plans, industry experts raised concerns about operational security and the implications of information leaks. Peter Hegseth emphasized that the meeting would focus on innovation and efficiencies within the defense infrastructure while discrediting claims regarding discussions of military action plans targeting China.

In response, Musk confirmed his frequent visits to the Pentagon and criticized the media for printing what he termed “maliciously false information.” He indicated that there would be consequences for those who leak misinformation regarding his meeting with Pentagon officials. The White House did not provide immediate commentary regarding these developments.

In summary, the concerns surrounding Elon Musk’s potential access to sensitive military information regarding China have stirred significant political discourse. Both Senator Gillibrand and other critics highlighted possible conflicts of interest, while officials from both the Trump administration and the Pentagon attempted to clarify the nature of Musk’s visit. As discussions about innovation in military strategies move forward, it remains imperative that operational security is maintained.

Original Source: www.foxnews.com

Related posts:

Elon Musk’s Pentagon Briefing Raises Ethical Concerns Trump Disputes Reports of Musk’s ‘Top-Secret’ China Briefing Elon Musk to Learn U.S. Military Plans for Potential War With China Trump Denies Report on Elon Musk’s Pentagon Briefing About China War