President Trump denied signing a proclamation allowing the deportation of Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act, despite his administration’s claims. A federal judge expressed concerns about the legality and implications of this law. Trump responded to criticism by suggesting others managed the deportation process and defended the actions taken against alleged gang members, while significant dismissals occurred within DHS’s civil rights branch.

United States President Donald Trump has denied signing a proclamation that would allow the deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members under an archaic law. This denial comes hours after a federal judge expressed concerns regarding Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, stating it was “incredibly troublesome”. Last weekend, Trump invoked this law to deport individuals alleged to be part of the Tren de Aragua gang, sending them to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador.

Despite having his signature on the official proclamation listed in the Federal Register, Trump suggested that the situation was managed by others, particularly indicating that his Secretary of State was more involved, saying, “I didn’t sign it. Other people handled it.” Trump acknowledged Senator Marco Rubio’s support for the deportations, noting, “Marco Rubio has done a great job and he wanted them out and we go along with that.”

In a critical hearing, Chief Judge James Boasberg raised legal questions regarding the application of the Alien Enemies Act, highlighting that its previous instances were during declared wars. He deemed the policy’s ramifications “incredibly troublesome and problematic”. Amid this legal debate, Boasberg issued an emergency order halting the deportation of Venezuelans, which resulted in returning flights already en route. The Justice Department contended that jurisdiction issues complicated the situation.

Trump reacted strongly against Boasberg, calling for the judge’s impeachment, labeling him a “troublemaker and agitator.” This statement prompted Chief Justice John Roberts to assert that impeachment was not an appropriate course of action in response to judicial disagreement. Lee Gelernt from the ACLU pointed out that historical deportations, such as during World War II, at least allowed individuals the opportunity for hearings, contrasting it with current conditions.

Despite the controversy, Trump defended the actions under the Alien Enemies Act by claiming a rigorous vetting process was in place for those deported, whom he described as a “bad group… killers, murderers and people that were really bad.” On the same day, significant dismissals occurred within the civil rights unit of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversaw immigration enforcement protocols.

In summary, President Trump’s denial of direct involvement in the controversial deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members raises important legal and ethical questions. The invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, along with the concerns expressed by Judge Boasberg, reflects the ongoing tension between immigration policy and due process. The situation underlines the need for careful scrutiny of both governmental actions and judicial oversight in matters of national security and individual rights.

Original Source: www.ndtv.com

Related posts:

Trump Denies Signing Deportation Proclamation Amid Legal Controversy Venezuelan Minister Denies Gang Affiliation of U.S. Deportees President Trump Attempts Deportation of Venezuelan Gang Under Wartime Law U.S. Deportation of Alleged Gang Members to El Salvador Sparks Controversy