The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg was added to an encrypted Signal group discussing U.S. military actions against Yemen’s Houthis, which included sensitive operational details leaked by Defense Secretary Hegseth. Trump was unaware of the incident, prompting investigations into the sharing of classified information. Lawmakers are demanding accountability, citing legal violations in discussing military plans on the messaging app.

On March 13, Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was unexpectedly invited to an encrypted Signal chat group that discussed military operations against Yemen’s Houthi rebels. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz directed his deputy Alex Wong to form a team for coordinating U.S. actions. National Security Council spokesperson Brian Hughes confirmed the authenticity of the chat group.

President Donald Trump initiated extensive military action against the Houthis on March 15, following attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, and issued a warning to Iran regarding its support for the group. Hours prior, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared operational details including targets, weaponry, and sequencing through the messaging group. Goldberg characterized this sharing of sensitive information as “shockingly reckless.”

The group included accounts resembling several high-ranking officials such as Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, among others. Joe Kent, nominated for director of the National Counterterrorism Center, was also part of the discussion despite lacking Senate confirmation. Trump publicly stated he was unaware of the incident and observed that he was not particularly fond of The Atlantic.

In response to the breach, the NSC’s Hughes indicated the messages appeared authentic and that they were investigating how an unintended number was added to the chat. Hegseth, however, denied disseminating war plans, reiterating to reporters, “Nobody was texting war plans.”

Screenshots revealed that officials debated the potential military strikes, with Vance expressing skepticism over assistance to European allies amid shipping risks. Hegseth responded, sharing Vance’s disdain for what he termed “European free-loading.” Vance also suggested delaying strikes due to possible ramifications, including rising oil prices.

The breach raises legal concerns surrounding the handling of classified information, which could constitute a violation of federal law. As discussions escalated, Congress members called for an investigation, with Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer noting it as a shocking breach of military intelligence.

Despite calls for accountability, there have been no immediate personnel changes within the White House, and officials maintain confidence in the national security team. Legislative scrutiny continues, with some officials labeling the Signal group’s usage as illegal and dangerous, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

In conclusion, the inadvertent sharing of sensitive military strategies through an encrypted messaging app by high-ranking U.S. officials has prompted widespread concern over possible legal implications and breaches of national security. The incident illustrates significant issues surrounding the handling of classified information within the current administration. Calls for thorough investigations are underway, as lawmakers and analysts express unease regarding the overall implications for national security protocols.

Original Source: m.economictimes.com

Related posts:

Breach of Military Intelligence: White House Accidentally Shares Yemen War Plans with Journalist Accidental Disclosure of War Plans: A Breach of National Security White House Confirms Authenticity of Yemen War Plans Shared on Signal Chat Trump Administration Addresses Yemen Signal Security Breach