The Atlantic revealed alleged leaks regarding U.S. strikes in Yemen, purportedly shared via Signal by officials of Trump’s National Security Council. The White House disputes claims of sharing classified information, asserting these were not war plans. Concerns have been raised about the implications of such disclosures for national security and military operations.

On Wednesday, The Atlantic released an article detailing purportedly leaked information regarding recent U.S. strikes in Yemen. This information was said to have been inadvertently shared with a journalist via the messaging platform Signal by senior members of President Donald Trump’s National Security Council. The publication challenges the administration’s assertions that no classified data was involved, emphasizing that the significance of the messages has been downplayed by officials.

The Atlantic notes that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth informed members of the “Houthi PC small group” on Signal about favorable weather conditions for upcoming airstrikes. Additionally, he provided an operational timeline for the deployment of F-18 aircraft, MQ-9 Reaper drones, and Tomahawk missiles targeting Houthi leaders in Yemen. Hegseth reportedly stated, “THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets.”

Despite the article’s claims, the White House has asserted that the shared communications did not constitute war plans. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt criticized The Atlantic for allegedly sensationalizing the account. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz also reinforced that the chat lacked detailed plans or specific target locations, asserting, “No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS.”

Additionally, former senior Pentagon official Mick Mulroy expressed concern over the potential implications of the shared information, labeling it as highly classified. He remarked that such disclosures could jeopardize ongoing operations and put lives in danger. The initial report from The Atlantic focused solely on operational aspects without disclosing sensitive specifics.

Following the operation, Hegseth reportedly updated members regarding the identification of specific Houthi leaders just before strikes were conducted. The situation remains fluid, and further updates are anticipated as the story develops.

The recent revelations from The Atlantic regarding supposed leaks of classified information on U.S. strikes in Yemen have sparked significant controversy. The White House has strongly refuted claims about the seriousness of the leaked details, insisting that no war plans were shared. As the situation evolves, concerns about the classification and security of military operations are paramount, highlighting the delicate balance between information disclosure and national security.

Original Source: abc13.com

Related posts:

White House Responds to Atlantic’s Report on Security Breach Regarding Yemen Strikes The Atlantic Publishes Unclassified Chat on U.S. Airstrikes Against Houthis Reckless Security Breach: Trump Officials Discuss Yemen Bombing in Group Chat Scrutiny Over Yemen War Plans Shared with Journalist Raises Security Alarm