Trump Administration’s Military Operations in Yemen Revealed Through Leaked Chats
Screenshots of a Signal chat revealing Trump administration’s Yemen attack plans surfaced, showing specific details about the military operation’s timing and asset deployment. Officials defended the chat as non-classified, while critics raised concerns about security. The exchange showcases both operational coordination and a celebratory attitude post-attack, along with ongoing disputes about the nature of the information revealed.
The Atlantic has disclosed screenshots from a Signal group chat featuring senior officials from the Trump administration, following an accidental addition of editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat. The released messages, although downplayed by the administration, detailed specific timings and assets for military operations planned in Yemen, raising concerns about their content and implications.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared multiple messages detailing the mission’s timeline, indicating favorable weather conditions and the launch schedules of F-18s and drones. Key messages included:
– “TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch.”
– “1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”
– “1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP).”
The messages indicated a high level of coordination and operational security amongst the officials involved, culminating in a U.S. military attack around 1:45 p.m. on March 15. Following the operation, officials expressed congratulations in the chat, suggesting a celebratory tone post-mission despite the previously secretive nature of the plans.
The Trump administration has consistently stated that these exchanges did not contain classified information, although they faced scrutiny for potentially exposing sensitive military operations. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt criticized the narrative of leaked war plans, labeling it an exaggeration from the media.
Despite the administration’s dismissals, Hegseth remarked on the chat’s lack of detailed information, contending that if these were indeed ‘war plans,’ they were severely lacking in substance. President Trump also defended his national security adviser, Mike Waltz, while disparaging Goldberg’s reporting and insights regarding military planning.
The leaked group chat from the Trump administration has stirred debate over the sensitivity of the information surrounding military operations in Yemen. While the administration insists no classified details were disclosed, the account sheds light on the operational readiness and the subsequent reactions following the attacks. The diversions in perspectives highlight the tension between governmental transparency and national security protocols.
Original Source: www.10news.com
Post Comment