This article recounts major updates for March 27, including a Supreme Court ruling on ghost guns, the Trump administration’s withdrawal of COVID-19 health funding, newly imposed tariffs on imported cars, changes in Social Security filing requirements, and the detention of a Tufts student over alleged immigration violations.

In a historic ruling, the Supreme Court upheld federal regulations on “ghost guns,” requiring manufacturers to include serial numbers on mail-order kits and conduct background checks for buyers. This decision marks a significant victory for gun control advocates, aiming to mitigate the rise of untraceable weapons built at home.

In other significant developments, the Atlantic published sensitive text messages from Trump officials discussing a military operation against Houthis in Yemen. This breach of communication raised concerns regarding operational security and highlighted ongoing tensions in the Trump administration regarding accountability and transparency.

The Trump administration has retracted over $11 billion in Covid-19 health funding previously allocated to state and local health departments. The funds, initially earmarked for testing and vaccinations, are now being reclaimed under the justification that the pandemic is over and the focus has shifted toward addressing chronic diseases.

In trade news, President Trump announced a 25% tariff on all imported cars and foreign-made car parts. This move has triggered negative reactions from major automotive companies, resulting in a notable decline in their stock prices. European and Canadian officials have condemned the tariffs as detrimental and a violation of trade agreements.

The Social Security Administration has reversed its plan requiring in-person or online claims for all benefit applicants. As of April 14, only claims for retirement and family benefits will be impacted, while those applying for disability and Medicare can still file claims via phone. This decision comes as the agency plans staffing reductions and local office closures, potentially hindering access for some applicants.

A Tufts University student, who co-authored an op-ed critical of the university’s response to the pro-Palestinian movement, was detained by immigration officials. The student, targeted for allegedly supporting Hamas, is under scrutiny without any formal charges being filed. This incident raises concerns over First Amendment rights and the implications of governmental actions related to academic discourse.

The developments from March 27 illustrate significant changes in various areas, including gun control, public health funding, international trade, Social Security policies, and immigration enforcement. Each of these issues reflects broader societal challenges and the current administration’s approach to governance, with implications for public policy and individual rights.

Original Source: www.cnn.com

Related posts:

Trump Denies Signing Deportation Proclamation Amid Legal Controversy Yemen Security Breach: Implications and Responses from the Trump Administration Revocation of Ranjani Srinivasan’s Visa: Implications and Context Security Breaches from Trump’s Team: Three Critical Violations Revealed by Signal Leak