Trump Aides Commit to Preserving Signal Messages Amid Yemen Attack Controversy
Officials from the Trump administration have pledged in court to preserve Signal app messages regarding a military operation in Yemen due to their potential automatic deletion. The nonprofit group American Oversight filed a lawsuit to protect these essential communications, raising concerns over the transparency and legality of their erasure. The Department of Justice and other agencies are collaborating to ensure these records are preserved, amidst criticisms regarding the use of disappearing messaging apps for sensitive military planning.
On Thursday, officials from the Trump administration affirmed their commitment to preserving conversations held via the Signal app regarding a military operation against Houthis in Yemen, despite the app’s automatic deletion feature. This assurance followed a lawsuit filed by the nonprofit group American Oversight, which aimed to safeguard these critical communications exchanged by top national security officials from March 11 to 15, notably due to the risk of their deletion.
Amber Richer, a lawyer from the Justice Department, indicated that they were cooperating with various agencies to ensure that these messages are preserved for the National Archives and Records Administration. Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg subsequently ordered these records to be safeguarded and requested updates on the preservation process by the following Monday.
The Signal chat became a focal point of controversy after the revelation by Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, who unintentionally joined the discussion and later disclosed details of the messages concerning the military operation. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz acknowledged his error in including Goldberg in the chat, which involved several high-ranking officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
The lawsuit named those officials and others, arguing that Waltz had configured the app to delete messages after either one week or four weeks. This aspect raises concerns, as the Federal Records Act mandates that officials must retain their communications for the National Archives. Chioma Chukwu, the interim executive director of American Oversight, criticized this practice, stating, “Using disappearing messaging apps to plan highly sensitive military operations isn’t just a transparency problem – it’s a national security crisis and potentially criminal.”
Richer also revealed that both the Treasury and Defense departments are actively working to preserve relevant records. Christopher Pilkerton, acting general counsel at the Treasury, stated that he had issued memos to officials directing them to take necessary measures to maintain all communications, including those on Signal. Meanwhile, the Defense department has requested copies of the relevant chat messages from Hegseth’s staff.
Moreover, another lawsuit from American Oversight concerning government spending cuts led to the Department of Government Efficiency instructing its staff to preserve all work-related communications in various formats. The memo emphasized the need to document messages received on personal devices and ensure they are transferred to work devices, including conversations via Signal and personal emails.
In conclusion, the Trump administration’s commitment to maintaining Signal messages related to the Yemen attack reflects significant concerns about national security and transparency. The actions taken by various departments to preserve these records highlight the importance of adhering to the Federal Records Act. Furthermore, the controversies surrounding the use of ephemeral messaging apps in sensitive military discussions present potential risks to accountability and transparency. This situation underscores the need for careful handling of communication practices among government officials.
Original Source: www.usatoday.com
Post Comment