Trump Administration Proposes Travel Ban Targeting 43 Countries
The Trump administration is drafting a travel ban targeting citizens from 43 countries. This proposal includes a “red” list of 11 countries for outright entry bans and an “orange” list of 10 countries with restricted access. The draft is still in review, with expected modifications before reaching the White House.
The Trump administration is contemplating a broader travel ban targeting citizens of up to 43 countries. This proposed ban exceeds the restrictions imposed during President Trump’s initial term, as revealed by insiders familiar with the situation. A draft list prepared by diplomatic and security officials categorizes these countries into three tiers.
The first tier, labeled the “red” list, consists of 11 nations whose citizens would face an outright entry ban into the United States. These countries include Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. Officials made it clear that this list is still in development.
The list originated from the State Department weeks ago, with anticipated revisions before reaching the White House. Experts from various government agencies, including the State Department, are currently assessing the draft and offering feedback on potential inaccuracies or policy considerations that could lead to adjustments.
Additionally, the proposal features an “orange” list comprising 10 nations subjected to travel restrictions, albeit not complete bans. In this case, affluent business travelers may be granted entry, while individuals seeking to enter on immigrant or tourist visas would be excluded. The evaluation process remains active, with input expected to influence the final decisions.
In summary, the Trump administration is considering an extensive travel ban affecting citizens from 43 countries, with a draft highlighting 11 nations for total entry prohibition. Experts are reviewing the proposals, which may evolve prior to presentation at the White House. While some countries face outright bans, others could see restricted access for specific travelers, reflecting a complex assessment process.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
Post Comment