President Trump reiterated his confidence in National Security Adviser Mike Waltz after a breach involving The Atlantic’s editor in a private chat about military plans surfaced. Waltz accepted full responsibility for the error, while Democratic lawmakers demanded accountability and investigation into the use of unapproved communication methods for sensitive discussions. White House officials maintained that no classified information was shared.

In a recent incident, President Donald Trump affirmed his support for National Security Adviser Mike Waltz following a breach involving The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief in a private military planning chat on Signal. Trump commented, “Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,” emphasizing trust in his administration despite the mistake.

The incident occurred when Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor of The Atlantic, was inadvertently added to a discussion regarding military plans for potential actions in Yemen. Trump clarified that a staffer educated in the matter mistakenly included Goldberg, stating, “It was one of Michael’s people on the phone.” He assessed that the breach had “no impact at all” on the operation, minimizing the event’s seriousness.

Waltz, in a Fox News interview, took full accountability for the chat’s organization, asserting, “I take full responsibility. I built the — I built the group.” His remarks came as Congressional Democrats expressed concern, categorizing the error as a reckless maneuver in national security.

Democratic lawmakers requested an investigation into the use of unapproved messaging services by senior officials for discussing national security matters. In defense, White House officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, insisted that no military plans were transmitted in the chats, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt affirming, “no classified material was sent to the thread.”

In response to the situation, the National Security Council defended the group chat as indicative of effective policy coordination among officials, asserting that the Houthi operation demonstrated the absence of threats to national security. The group chat’s disclosure draws parallels to past controversies, notably referencing Hillary Clinton’s private email server during her tenure.

Initially skeptical of the chat’s validity, Goldberg felt assured of its authenticity after the military actions discussed commenced in Yemen. Trump responded to inquiries about the issue, stating he was unaware of the details prior to the questioning, labeling it as the first revelation of its kind to him.

In summary, President Trump’s support for National Security Adviser Mike Waltz remains firm despite the recent Signal chat controversy involving The Atlantic editor. The incident raised significant concerns among Democratic lawmakers, highlighting issues related to national security protocols. Both the White House and Waltz accepted responsibility for the breach, asserting that no classified information was compromised and that ongoing policy coordination remains robust. The occurrence mirrors past scrutiny regarding communication and security practices among government officials.

Original Source: www.nbcnews.com

Related posts:

Mike Waltz Takes Responsibility for Signal Chat Leak on Yemen War Plans Trump Dismisses Yemen Chat Breach as Minor Glitch Amid Rising Concerns Trump Dismisses Yemen Chat Breach as a Minor Glitch, Calls for Continued Confidence in National Security Team White House Responds to Signal Chat Incident Involving National Security Discussion