Politics
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ASIA, AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY, BLAKE PRZESMICKI, CHINA, CNBC, DONALD TRUMP, FRANCISCO JERONIMO, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INTERNATIONAL DATA CORPORATION, JEFF FIELDHACK, JERONIMO, MEXICO, NORTH AMERICA, ROBOTICS, TECHNOLOGY, TRUMP, TRUMP ORGANIZATION, U. S, UNITED STATES, US-CHINA RELATIONS
Dante Raeburn
0 Comments
Trump’s $499 Smartphone Likely to Be Made in China
The Trump Organization’s new smartphone, the T1, is expected to be manufactured in China despite claims of U.S. production. Experts highlight that the phone will rely on global supply chains for its components, making complete American manufacturing highly unlikely. The T1 features a 6.8-inch AMOLED display and is priced at $499, leaning on Chinese and Taiwanese technology.
The Trump Organization has announced the launch of its new smartphone, the T1, which is set to retail for $499. While the company claims that the device will, in fact, be built in the United States, experts are raising eyebrows over these assertions. Most notably, they contend that the device will likely be manufactured in China, largely contradicting the Trump Organization’s statements.
According to Francisco Jeronimo, vice president at International Data Corporation, it seems quite unrealistic to believe that the phone was developed from scratch and that some sort of local assembly in the U.S. is feasible. He stated, “There is no way the phone was designed from scratch and there is no way it is going to be assembled in the U.S. or completely manufactured in the U.S. That is completely impossible.”
Blake Przesmicki, an analyst at Counterpoint Research, echoed these sentiments in a recent note, indicating that the T1 would probably be produced by a Chinese original device manufacturer (ODM). This type of company typically designs and manufactures products based on another firm’s specifications. “Despite being advertised as an American-made phone, it is likely that this device will be initially produced by a Chinese ODM,” Przesmicki remarked.
Adding to the skepticism, Jeff Fieldhack, research director at Counterpoint Research, noted that the U.S. lacks the manufacturing capabilities necessary for such a device. The potential for tariffs on imported devices has intensified the focus on domestic manufacturing, especially after Trump took aim at companies like Apple, urging them to shift their production to the U.S. This remains an uphill battle, as many experts argue that making iPhones at home would dramatically increase their retail price, with large-scale U.S. manufacturing taking years to establish.
Even if certain elements of the T1 can be manufactured in the U.S., it is important to recognize that the essential components for smartphones are sourced from various countries. The T1 features a 6.8-inch AMOLED display, a technology primarily produced by the South Korean companies Samsung and LG, as well as China’s BOE. For context, the iPhone 16 Pro Max sports a slightly larger 6.9-inch display but starts at a steep price of $1,199.
In terms of its processor, the T1 will likely use a chipset from MediaTek, a company based in Taiwan. If Qualcomm chips are utilized, those, too, would need to be sourced from Taiwan, establishing a clear reliance on international verification. The smartphone’s promised 50-megapixel camera will necessitate image sensing chips, primarily dominated by the Japanese firm Sony, along with smaller firms from China and abroad.
Some aspects of the T1’s memory could potentially feature American technology, possibly sourced from Micron, which is based in the U.S. However, it may also not be surprising to see Samsung emerge as a supplier for its components. As Fieldhack pointed out, “Even when there is local manufacturing available the company will have to rely on components that are being imported from outside the U.S.” Thus, even if some assembly of the T1 occurs stateside, global supply chains will certainly play a crucial role in its production.
In summary, the Trump Organization’s newly unveiled T1 smartphone, while advertised as being made in the U.S., is more likely to rely on Chinese manufacturing and components from around the globe. Experts unanimously agree that the complexities of modern smartphone production make it virtually impossible for a fully U.S.-made device. The reliance on global supply chains sets the stage for continued scrutiny as the device hits the market.
Original Source: www.cnbc.com
Post Comment