The Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled that Jordan Chiles’ appeal to increase her floor exercise score was invalid due to late submission. Her score reverted to 13.666, placing her fifth. Following the ruling, Chiles faced criticism online and announced her withdrawal from social media for mental health reasons. USA Gymnastics condemned the harassment and expressed support for Chiles.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) announced on 10 August that an appeal regarding Jordan Chiles’ floor exercise score during the Paris 2024 Olympic Games was deemed invalid. Initially, Chiles received a score of 13.666, placing her fifth behind champions Rebeca Andrade, Simone Biles, and two Romanian competitors, Ana Barbosu and Sabrina Voinea. An inquiry raised by her coach, Cecile Landi, had sought to increase her score, propelling her to a bronze position, which led to confusion on the podium as Barbosu prematurely celebrated.

CAS clarified that the appeal submitted by Chiles’ team occurred after the one-minute deadline permitted by the 2024 FIG Technical Regulations, rendering it ineffective. Consequently, her score reverted back to the original 13.666. The ruling indicated that the International Gymnastics Federation (FIG) was responsible for determining final rankings and assigning the medals. Despite this development, the FIG has not made a public statement regarding the ruling as of Saturday evening.

In the wake of the CAS ruling, Jordan Chiles has encountered significant backlash on social media. She addressed her followers with a message indicating her intention to withdraw from social media for mental health reasons, expressing her need for personal time away after facing online attacks. USA Gymnastics and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee jointly issued a statement defending Chiles, noting that the appeal was made in good faith.

The organizations condemned the online harassment that Chiles experienced, affirming that no athlete should endure such treatment. They praised Chiles for her integrity, both in competition and beyond, and expressed their unwavering support for her. This incident raises questions about the treatment of athletes in high-pressure competitive environments and the need for protections against harassment.

The incident involving Jordan Chiles’ score at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games highlights the challenges athletes face regarding scoring disputes and the pressures from public scrutiny. Chiles’ situation shines a light on the importance of adhering to regulations set by governing bodies, such as the FIG, and the potential ramifications of not complying with procedural deadlines. Furthermore, it emphasizes the psychological toll that competitive sports can impose on athletes, particularly in the age of social media.

In summary, the CAS ruling has reinforced the integrity of scoring procedures within gymnastics by dismissing Chiles’ appeal due to late submission. This situation not only highlights the competitive stakes involved at prestigious events like the Olympics but also underscores the significant pressures athletes face from external criticism. The support from USA Gymnastics and the U.S. Olympic Committee reflects a commitment to safeguarding athletes’ well-being amid such challenges, reminding the public of the dignity and respect all competitors deserve.

Original Source: www.olympics.com

Related posts:

Ana Barbosu Joins Stanford, Initiating Rivalry with Olympic Opponent Jordan Chiles in NCAA Gymnastics Rebeca Andrade Triumphs in Women’s Floor Exercise at Paris 2024 Simone Biles and Jordan Chiles Reflect on a Triumphant 2024 Simone Biles Honored as Sports Illustrated’s 2024 Sportsperson of the Year