Loading Now

Justice Alexandre de Moraes Defends Brazil’s Sovereignty Against U.S. Criticism

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes defended Brazil’s sovereignty, declaring the country ceased to be a colony in 1822, during a session following U.S. political criticism. This statement emphasized Brazil’s independence and the creation of the UN in a historical context. The Brazilian Foreign Ministry supported Moraes, claiming the Trump administration distorted his orders’ meanings.

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has strongly defended Brazil’s sovereignty, asserting that Brazil ceased to be a colony as of September 7, 1822. He made these remarks during a plenary session of the court, following heightened criticism from U.S. politicians. Although he did not specify the United States, he highlighted Brazil’s independence and referenced the establishment of the United Nations as a response to Nazism.

Justice Moraes emphasized, “I reaffirm our unwavering commitment to defending the Brazilian Constitution, Brazil’s sovereignty, the independence of the Judiciary, and the citizenship of all Brazilian men and women, as we ceased to be a colony on September 7, 1822.” His statements come in light of a lawsuit filed by Donald Trump’s media company, Truth Social, alongside Rumble, challenging his judicial decisions in Florida.

Meanwhile, the Brazilian Foreign Ministry has publicly supported Justice Moraes, issuing a statement that accuses the Trump administration of misrepresenting the intentions behind Moraes’ orders. This statement was released after consultations with Justice Moraes, indicating a unified front against the external criticisms.

In summary, Justice Alexandre de Moraes has reaffirmed Brazil’s sovereignty and independence from colonial status since 1822 amidst criticisms from American political figures. The Brazilian Foreign Ministry has backed him, criticizing the mischaracterization of his judicial actions by elements within the Trump administration, showcasing the tension between Brazilian and U.S. political narratives.

Original Source: www1.folha.uol.com.br

Post Comment