The governance of Gaza after the war is a critical issue, with proposals from Trump, Lapid, and Egypt encountering various challenges. Trump’s controversial resettlement plan, Lapid’s rejected Egyptian solution, and Egypt’s ambitious rebuilding strategy highlight the complexities involved. The future of Gaza’s governance heavily relies on maintaining a cease-fire and overcoming substantial political obstacles.

The question of who will govern Gaza following the war is pivotal for securing a cease-fire and promoting lasting peace. As discussions unfold, U.S. President Donald Trump, Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid, and Egypt have all proposed distinct governance plans for Gaza. These proposals also highlight the contentions existing between Israel, Hamas, and international stakeholders.

Trump’s proposal aims to permanently resettle Palestinians from Gaza into Jordan and Egypt, creating new communities but facing intense opposition. While this plan garnered a favorable response from Israel, it drew widespread condemnation due to allegations of ethnic cleansing and violations of international law. Critics emphasize that this approach undermines Palestinian aspirations for statehood.

On the contrary, Yair Lapid’s plan, termed the “Egyptian solution,” would assign Egypt control over Gaza’s civilian and security affairs for an interim period. This proposal envisions a demilitarized Gaza, with Egypt leading reconstruction alongside Gulf states backing the endeavor. However, Egypt has rejected this plan, complicating its implementation.

Egypt’s own plan, backed by Arab countries, seeks to rebuild Gaza over five years, emphasizing infrastructure and establishing a temporary technocratic governance structure. Although it supports a two-state solution, its adequacy is questioned due to potential challenges from the Palestinian Authority’s reputation and the lack of explicit calls for disarmament of militant groups.

All these proposals are contingent upon the continuation of a fragile cease-fire, which is currently at risk. Israel’s restrictions on aid to Gaza and Trump’s ultimatum to Hamas exacerbate tensions. The statement from Hamas indicating a willingness to cede governance further complicates the landscape.

Moreover, ongoing Israeli military operations in the West Bank threaten to destabilize the peace process. As a volatile atmosphere surrounds attempts at establishing governance in Gaza, the international community watches closely, awaiting potential developments amidst rising uncertainties.

In summary, the governance of Gaza post-war remains uncertain as competing proposals from Trump, Lapid, and Egypt confront numerous hurdles. Trump’s controversial plan for resettlement faces significant backlash, while Lapid’s Egyptian solution has been rejected by Egypt itself. Egypt’s comprehensive rebuilding proposal is hampered by challenges concerning legitimacy and funding. Ultimately, the effectiveness of these plans is contingent upon the stability of the cease-fire and the broader dynamics at play within the complex Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Original Source: foreignpolicy.com

Related posts:

Tens of Thousands of Palestinians Await Return to Northern Gaza Amid Tensions Arab Leaders Unite to Support Egypt’s Gaza Reconstruction Plan Amidst U.S. Opposition Hamas Supports Egyptian Plan for Gaza Reconstruction; Israel and US Rebuff Trump Issues Ultimatum to Hamas Amid Ongoing Conflict and Reconstruction Plans