The Case for Indian Mediation in the Ukraine-Russia War
This article argues that India should actively mediate in the Ukraine-Russia war, as it possesses the unique acceptability among key players and the opportunity to positively influence global politics. India’s strategic decisions and growing partnerships position it well to propose a consultative meeting and facilitate ceasefire discussions, overcoming fears of failure in the process.
The notion that India should postpone mediation in international conflicts, such as the Ukraine-Russia war, until it gains greater power is erroneous. The Ministry of External Affairs indicated in the past that India seeks to assist in finding peaceful resolutions to these complex issues. Therefore, it is timely for New Delhi to facilitate an end to the ongoing conflict between the two nations.
India’s cautious stance in refraining from condemning Russia, while balancing its interests with the West, has yielded positive outcomes. As a result, New Delhi has reason to be content with its strategic decisions thus far. However, in the current climate of global politics, India must become actively engaged to remain relevant.
The ongoing discussions in Riyadh to resolve the war present a critical opportunity for India to assert itself. Given that these talks have been described as incomplete, New Delhi could propose to mediate discussions for a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, involving American participation.
India should pursue mediation for three fundamental reasons. Firstly, the timing is opportune; while Russia may be advancing militarily, it is eager to lift sanctions and engage in conversations with the US, which are beginning in Riyadh. However, European engagement is also necessary for Russia’s reintegration into the security framework, and Ukraine’s inclusion has yet to be addressed in these talks.
Secondly, India possesses a unique acceptability among the key players in this conflict. It stands as one of the few major nations that the involved parties regard favorably. In contrast, China may face skepticism from the US and Russia might distrust its intentions.
Thirdly, engaging in mediation aligns with India’s national interests and aspirations to become a significant player on the global stage. By actively participating in these discussions, India can enhance its influence and open doors to various world capitals.
In the event of a ceasefire, Ukraine may demand assurances against future Russian aggression. India’s participation as peacekeepers could be beneficial due to its neutral stance and experience in similar roles. Rather than merely supporting solutions established by others, India should aim to initiate negotiations and take a hands-on approach to implementing peace.
Nevertheless, several factors inhibit India’s mediation efforts. Primarily, there is apprehension regarding potential failure; what if the mediation does not yield results? Despite such concerns, the benefits of geopolitical standing and influence should encourage India to proceed, as many negotiations do not achieve their intended outcomes.
It is essential to recognize that mediation is not solely about conclusively resolving the conflict; it is often about facilitating dialogue between parties. Adversaries frequently seek avenues to communicate, and a neutral mediator can help create those pathways.
To make progress, India ought to appoint a special envoy to engage discreetly with the involved parties, understand their positions, and propose India as a negotiation venue. Comparing India’s economic stature, its GDP significantly exceeds those of current mediators like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. Being a constructive force in these discussions is determined more by political resolve than mere economic metrics.
With a history of experiencing foreign mediation in its conflicts, it is evident that the time has come for India to take the initiative in mediating international disputes.
In conclusion, India stands at a vital juncture where it can effectively mediate in the Ukraine war. The timely opportunity, coupled with India’s unique acceptability among involved parties and potential benefits to its national interests, necessitates active participation. Overcoming fears of failure and taking proactive steps to engage in dialogue will not only enhance India’s global standing but also contribute to lasting peace in the region. It is essential for India to shed outdated notions of hesitance and embrace its role as an influential global mediator.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
Post Comment